| Hapimeses said: The root of your argument seems to be: anyone who reads or watches manga including pre-18s having sex is a paedophile, is that correct? If so, how do you define a paedophile? What sort of manga (or, indeed, any other sort or media) do you feel is 'wrong'? I must admit that I find many of your views quite extreme, and also quite unrealistic. |
Well, paedophilia is the sexaul attraction towards pre-pubescent children. So no, not all manga would be paedophile material. It's hard to draw a line but I'd say anything depicting children under the ages of 11-12 is sexuual situations is paedophile material.
Regarding your previous post (the long one), no civilized country protects child pornography under the guise of "freedom of speech". And freedom of speech should be limited, like any freedom (no child porn, no promotions of racism/misogynism/homophobia etc., no instignations towards violence, no libel), else you'l have anarchy.
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)
