Lostplanet22 said:
HappySqurriel said:
Just as a note, I find it odd that the same people who were saying before E3 "HD console graphics are fine, and there is no reason for an upgrade for many years" are now say that the Wii U is garbage because it is suggested that it will have similar performance ...
With that said, I would like to see someone like John Carmack talk about the Wii U's capabilities because what one person means by "not more powerful" might not be what I mean by "not more powerful". It could be argued that the XBox and Wii were not significantly more powerful than the Dreamcast because the output resolutions, graphical techniques used, and overall results are similar. |
Because those many years will change to a few years when the Wii U is released and on the same note you could also find people in 2009 who were tired of these HD generation and want to move on...
Anyway those Tech demo's don't really proof that Wii U is way more powerfull, Nintendo knows how to max an console for an example look to Super Mario Galaxy (1 and 2) how many Wii games are their that look better while SMG is now (almost) 4 years old? Let Miyamoto work on a Mario game on PS3 and he probably would create one if not the best graphics game we saw this HD generation..
|
I don't think we're talking about the same thing ...
Everytime the rumours about the Wii U have changed you can see the opinions of some people flip-flop between "The Wii U being more powerful is meaningless because the HD consoles are good enough anyways" and "The Wii U is garbage because it is not dramatically more powerful than the HD consoles"
