Fumanchu said:
I don't understand why the alternatives are perceived to be prohibatively expensive - isn't Nintendo doing the same thing? Surely the Wii-U isn't rumoured at $599? There are other reasons not to use Blu-ray;- 1. Stop piracy. How many computers will have a HDDVD burner? 2. License fees. I think I remember reading that the BDA charge $30 per device - this has probably gone down now though. 3. Streaming data speeds. Although you can get 12x BD now, much faster than the 2x in the PS3. They may choose to go for USB, but surely this would be very expensive. |
Nintendo is still using a variant of Blu-ray. Unless it's some magical new disc that just so happens to be 25gb in size and also uses blue laser diodes.
It's just like how the Wii uses slightly altered DVDs.
There will absolutely be added costs associated with the manufacturing of HD DVD drives solely for a new Xbox, as well as the refitting of DVD production lines to manufacture HD DVDs, and the format still has licensing fees of its own. You'd have to take into account those expenses on top of the disadvantges not including a Blu-ray player has (a media center device that can't play Blu-ray in 2013?). It's just not feasible.







