| makingmusic476 said: There's no reason not to use Blu-ray, and there's plenty of reasons TO use Blu-ray. Of course, they could go with a blue laser variant that's very similar to Blu-ray, and thus would still be relatively cheap, but why do that when... |
I don't understand why the alternatives are perceived to be prohibatively expensive - isn't Nintendo doing the same thing? Surely the Wii-U isn't rumoured at $599?
There are other reasons not to use Blu-ray;-
1. Stop piracy. How many computers will have a HDDVD burner?
2. License fees. I think I remember reading that the BDA charge $30 per device - this has probably gone down now though.
3. Streaming data speeds. Although you can get 12x BD now, much faster than the 2x in the PS3. They may choose to go for USB, but surely this would be very expensive.







