9/11 was a conspiracy not a conspiracy theory

[Tony_Stark]

Metallicube said:

So, I'm going to stop arguing with people here, or at least tone it down, because obviously their mind is made up, as mine is, and continuing to talk in circles like this would eventually being to drive me nuts, as I'm sure it would many of you. But I just have one question for the supporters of the official conspiracy theory. I'm genuinely curious about this...

When you look at this footage here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A

Do you HONESTLY believe that this building imploding was a result of a few office fires and debris damage on on side? And here are a few fun facts to keep in mind.
- NO steel building has EVER collapsed from fire... in the history of the world, let alone at freefall acceleration.

- NO plane hit this building. This building was also the farthest away from WTC 1 and 2, yet the other WTC buildings, positioned MUCH closer, DID NOT collapse.

- This footage was NOT sped up. This 47 story building REALLY came down as rapidly as you witness it; in its own footprint, barely damaging surrounding structures, in... get this... SEVEN SECONDS. Near freefall acceleration, which is impossible unless there is NO resistance from the floors below.

- One of the two people trapped in this building, WTC 7, went on record saying their were explosions in the building, causing the floors below him to cave in. He also claimed to be stepping over bodies. Guess what? He mysteriously died just DAYS before the final NIST report of this building's collapse.

- Molten metal was found at the bottom of this tower - not possible with fire. And remember, no plane hit it.

- This building housed many important government documents, including cases on insider trading and the unethical practices of companies like Enron.

- Larry Silverstein owned this building, along with WTC 1 and 2, which were coincidentally the only WTC buildings that collapsed. He set up a massive insurance policy covering acts of terrorism, just weeks before 9/11. He did not own the other WTC towers, which again, were positioned CLOSER to the main towers that fell practically on them. And guess what? The other towers did not collapse.

- Like WTC 1 and 2, this building had dozens of thick steel beams running from the basement to the roof. This building couldn't implode symmetrically without ALL beams failing simultaneously.

- And remember, this is only one of literally a THOUSAND pieces of evidence. This is just one of the biggest smoking guns for me, so I was curious as to what you official conspiracy theory supporters think.

Did this building fall organically from fires and debris pelting one side, or not? Not trying to be a smart ass or anything, just honestly curious as to what you think.

I don't know, and I really don't care, this building had nothing to do with the twin towers falling. It was an isolated incident that could have been a demolition, But if that is the case, it wasn't planned by the government, it was planned by a private party. It very well could have been that somebody knew about the imminant attacks, and took advantage of the information. I know this may be purely anecdotal, but my dad worked at IBM in Rochester, MN at the time, and he said that on 9/11 there wasn't a single muslim that showed up to work that day. Not a single one. Now, you don't think they knew?