bugrimmar on 19 June 2011
| Rath said: This is a hopeless measure. It's more a measure of the team than the player. If a player joins one of the top teams and wins 5 rings with them does that make him a better leader than a player who brings a historically worse team up to the top over a few seasons and then wins four rings? Leadership is a subjective quantity, you can't objectively measure it. |
agreed. however, we can measure the number of championships a person has. the people who can consistently win championships still gets priority despite the subjectivity of leadership skill. this list is only made to measure that one single quantifiable number: rings.
