E3. How it has changed? Did noone win E3?

[Lostplanet22]

irstupid said:

Kantor said:
I would agree with that. I thought EA's press conference, and especially that of Ubisoft, was better than any of the Big Three's press conferences. Really, the only sure-fire way to "win" in most people's minds is to show a wide range of games, both existing and new, in a variety of genres, and have almost all of them look enjoyable. That's what Ubisoft did, and what frankly Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo and EA struggled to do.

Sony showed very little new material, Microsoft focused too heavily on Kinect, and Nintendo's conference was confusing and ignored the Wii. EA put too much emphasis on celebrity cameos and sports games, but it was mostly rescued by Battlefield 3 and ME3, I think.

people have to realize that time is limited.  nintendo has shown plenty on wii outside the conference.

what did you expect.  when you take into account it being the 25th anniversery for zelda so time for that.  Then BASICALLY TWO NEW consoles to talk about.  If they spent any moore time on the wii people would bitch about not spending enough time on the wii u.   nintendo should have extended at least another 30 minutes due to having essentially 2 new consoles to talk about. 

Xenoblade and the last story are coming....  Take less than 30 seconds and would have made a lot of people happy :).  All three of them are spending way to much talking nonsense..

Like I mentioned before the MS E3 conference in 2006 was a great conference....It is ridiculous what they all announced and shown in 90 minutes;.