| HappySqurriel said: Every time I see 911-truther's arguments I realize how bad the American education system is ... First off, much like how cars are engineered with crashes in mind, when large towers are designed there is a considerable effort put towards managing how the building will fail. Being that you don't want a 100 story building to tip over and spread its destruction over many blocks, most of these buildings are designed to collapse inwards and fall ontop of itself. Secondly, being that the weight of materials on tall towers is the primary stress on these buildings they're designed with a relatively small margin of error. When you (effectively) have the weight of dozens of floors falling 1 story because the structure beneath it has given way due to a fire damaging the structural integrity of the building, the force is so much greater than what the building can handle that every story will collapse as they experience this force. |
Thanks for the unintelligent remark.. I thought Mr. Bubbles had that covered. Anyways, I have heard those statements before. I could correlate that was what happened except that apparently most of the jet fuel burnt up outside. There is a flash before the plane even hits the building. There are unknown huge things underneath the fuselage that are never on commercial flights (people at airport would have recognize them). Witnesses said that the plane wasn't an American Airlines plane (didn't have markings). How did the terrorist with little flight training pull of maneuvers that even trained pilots admit is impossible for inexperienced pilots to preform?
Can you explain all that too? How about explaining the pentagon crash and why there was such little debris? The hole wasn't big enough to fit the wing/engines/tail in yet there was barely if any wreckage outside. Why did they release only one security camera footage of it when there were numerous more cameras. Why can't you even see a plane in the footage? Can you explain the pentagon crash?
