First of all, I'm pretty sure that that would not be child pornography.
Wait, *checks legal dictionaries*
Lol, that is ludicrous.
Pornography is the depiction of sexual behavior that is intended to arouse sexual excitement in its audience.
Child pornography is the visual representation of minors under the age of 18 engaged in sexual activity or the visual representation of minors engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer's sexual interest.
So if the people were 18, it would not legally be porn, because it was not intended to arouse sexual excitement.
If the people were naked, aged 15 and 17 and were just standing there sipping their soda, it would not legally be porn - it does not show minors engaged in sexual activity, and it is not designed to arouse the viewer's sexual interest.
The legal system is a joke.
