Explain to me how PS3 and Wii had better E3 than 360

[lurkerwithnosoul]

Lostplanet22 said:

lurkerwithnosoul said:

Gojimaster said:
Are you guys even that excited about Halo 4 after the disappointment that was Halo Reach?

 

Halo Reach was no disappointment. And, by that logic, no one should be excited for PSV after the disappointment PSP was.

 

Anyway, i agree with the OP. Xbox 360 had the best games of the 3.

You have hardly touched Halo Reach

http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Reach/Default.aspx?player=irkenkats&sg=0

You played less than 5 hours in multiplayer and that is including competetive/invasion/Firefight and Arena..

And you have two achievements for Halo 3 destroy a vehicle and finish the first mission....

You only played the first mission of Halo 3......and didn't do much in Halo Reach either...how can you even compare them and call it a dissapointment or not...

This is really a big gripe I have with the MS community on Vgchartz...  Hyping up Halo 4/Halo HD: Anniversary like it is best game ever....while most of those people hardly play the other games..

This is really sad.

 

It's seem more that you have a grip against me and don't know squat about the community... Because i think 3 and Reach were both played by most of the users, at least, the most vocal ones. But, i don't know for sure, since some don't even use a gamercard to let me stalk them. :p

Really now. I've completed the game and played online. That you can not deny. If i am not allowed to express my opinion, then i don't know what your standards are.

But see, the game has 91 of metascore, sold more than 8 millions of copies, most of my friends love the game, as so most of the random people with xbox i know from the internet do. So, by all means, to me Halo Reach was not a disappointment.

 

And the fact i just completed the first mission or so of Halo 3 have nothing to do with this. I don't even remmember the last time i played that game. lol