| theprof00 said: EDIT: I just feel like it's shoehorned onto this idea of cleanliness when really, either way, there is no strong difference. |
And it most certainly has. To my knowledge theres no scientific proof of it "for sure" lowering the risk of cancer. But as i said in my previous post, we know for a fact certain things about why the procedure is beneficial. If parents are hesitant we do NOT do it. We will absolutley not do any medical procedure without the parents (or patient in other situations) verbalizing an understanding and why they want it done. Its not like we go in their with a debate team to convince them or anything.
We explain theres no need to be alarmed or scared if they choose to not have it done, just they must meticulously educate their child on the importance of cleanliness after intercourse, drying after bathing, washing daily, checking to make sure its been cleaned thoroughly....in the end these are the facts and in the end its usually done because while theres no factual concrete evidence of preventing or limiting cancer, we know having the foreskin removed limits the possibility of infection and essentially is easier to maintain that part of the body.
The idea behind it is like anything though. I could go 2 years without washing my hands after going to the bathroom and never get sick. But wash meticulously and end up gettign sick. We just make our decisions and information based on the facts: bacteria liek these places and gather there, its not easily visible an dmust be maintained because of this and removing or keeping is a moot point as theres no harm to the function of the body keeping or cutting. we stress it doesnt mean they will get an infection but we offer them the choice to prophylacticly limit the risk potential. thats all. And again, its a choice, not sure why people feel the need to force religious or social beliefs on people for no reason other than their egos.
