Wonktonodi said:
it's not claiming curing it's making someone less likely to get it By making the penis less likely to have nicro abrasions allowing other bodly fluids in. Also last I checked the article in the post above is scientific american. They are doing it in Africa because that's where aids is worse. I don't see why you need to site bad sources. I was bringing this up to show that there is some medical benefic to circumcision. It's a different argument on if it should be done on infants, I'm just pointing out there are benefits.
|
I understand the point, and I understand the study, but why is it only working in Africa. Why is it that in America, the rate of stds is most prevalent in the circumcised? It just points to there being some kind of mistake going on. I've been trying to find the actual article, the actual write-up for the methodology, but when I type in his name I just get quotes and other sites publishing that news. However, one of the quotes that I saw was "circumcision, in tandem with condom use lowers AIDS rate". Yet, the same circumstances exist in America and the case isn't the same. There is some flaw that I can't help but picture. Something is wrong with the study.
