By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
disolitude said:
scottie said:
 

 

Haha, yeah you got me. I've never owned an Ipod or used Itunes. I didn't have an ipod classic 20 gb, 2 ipod minis, a shuffle and an ipod touch sitting somewher ein the basement. And all of them didn't break within a year of usage...none of that happened.

Seriously though. next time you have a chance try bing search on a windows phone. It is actually pretty good integration in to the phone, and you may not come of sounding so ignorant if you know what you're talking about.


What problems have you encountered with syncing ipods to itunes on windows. I am not interested in hardware faults. I have owned a couple of ipods, and connected them to both my mac and my windows computers, and never encountered any bugs, nor any differences between the windows and mac versions of itunes. Nor have I ever heard anyone claim that ipods dont work well with windows (apart from the very first ones that didn't work with windows at all, obviously) hence I'm sure you can understand why I do not believe in these mystery bugs you mentioned.

 

As for the 'try it and you might like it' attitude towards bing, I have tried it, many many times. It is incapable of producing relevant results. The comptuers at my uni recently got new software put on, which means they have IE7 and Firefox. Of course, The uni's logon system is incompatible with Firefox, so they only have IE7. When I'm just trying to search something very simple, I use bing, because that's what the search toolbar uses. It has not once produced useful results, and I have given up. How then, is bing better on a phone than on a PC? The bing search algorithm just isn't up to scratch.