Circumcision ban getting people snippy.

[Wonktonodi]

theprof00 said:

Wonktonodi said:

acer67 said:

lol i think its a bit different reason read here its pretty easy to read summary http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=circumcision-and-aids

thanks that also got the term I had forgoten "microscopic abrasions"

Also forgot the term, "trials done in america and europe, and results showed no statistical significance"

Did you also know that child rape cures AIDs?

http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2002/april/virgin.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6076758.stm

I wouldn't trust anythign out of Africa. AIDS is transmitted through bodily fluids, not how close they are to immune cells.

it's not claiming curing it's making someone less likely to get it By making the penis less likely to have nicro abrasions allowing other bodly fluids in.

Also last I checked the article in the post above is scientific american. They are doing it in Africa because that's where aids is worse. I don't see why you need to site bad sources.

I was bringing this up to show that there is some medical benefic to circumcision. It's a different argument on if it should be done on infants, I'm just pointing out there are benefits.