Circumcision ban getting people snippy.

[elticker]

pearljammer said:

elticker said:

theprof00 said:

 

that's not a fact, it is a theory with no evidence. end of story.

it is a fact that having more surface area = more area for hpv to be in or hide in. could you disprove it. no, end story.

however that doesn't mean that uncircumsized men have to have hpv. they could wash but if on an eqaul basis each or circumsized vs uncircumsized are exactly exposed to the same conditions and each washes his dick for 30 seconds everyday, the probability will be higher that the uncircumsed will have a higher chance of having hpv than the circumsized one.

I'll give you the assumption that you're right here:

You must realize, though, that this very dialogue is absurd. Who the hell washes according to averages. Whether or not one is easier to wash is beside the point. It's still extremely easy to wash.

By the same logic, it'd be noteworthy to point out that people with larger penises are more susceptible to acquire hpv due to increased surface area. While this may be true, it is an absurd dialogue to have, becuase they simply wash longer. It's a matter of seconds and is pointless in discussing.

Let me reiterate: it is as ridiculous as pointing out that people with larger hands are more susceptible to ingesting germs to to an increased time, on average, it takes to clean them. Totally absurd.

yes however you don't take in human error, having to wash more and under the shaft. i am just saying there is an increased chance by how much i don't know, i dont have an uncircumsized dick so i don't know how much it takes to wash it. its also pointing out that more effort is needed in cleaning an uncircumsized dick and knowing the nature of man which is pretty lazy, he may sometimes take shortcuts which may mean increased chance of error.

well nvm i don't really have statistics or have tryed washing an uncircumsized dick. ignore ...........