By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
elticker said:
theprof00 said:
elticker said:
pearljammer said:
elticker said:
also remember that by being uncircumsized you carry more of the hpv as it is harder to clean uncircumsized dicks. hpv has been linked to umm what was it i think it was uterus/vaginal cancer something like that which has to do with the womens reproductive system.

Saying that a penis that isn't circumcized is difficult to clean is as absurd as it is to say that it's difficult to clean the back of your ears.


i didn't say it is difficult to clean. i said it is harder to clean the a circumsized one and hpv can hide anywhere on your penis, with having an uncircumsized penis you have more surface area therefore more place in which hpv can be in.

that's not a fact, it is a theory with no evidence. end of story.



it is a fact that having more surface area = more area for hpv to be in or hide in. could you disprove it. no, end story.

however that doesn't mean that uncircumsized men have to have hpv. they could wash but if on an eqaul basis each or circumsized vs uncircumsized are exactly exposed to the same conditions and each washes his dick for 30 seconds everyday, the probability will be higher that the uncircumsed will have a higher chance of having hpv than the circumsized one.

yes, i can disprove it. You can get cold sores regardless of how large your mouth is. You are not MORE susceptible to getting cold sores if you have a wider mouth. Similarly, hpv doesn't hide or be in any particular part. If you contract hpv, then you get it WHEREVER there is space to get it. It has nothing to do with area, otherwise men with larger penises should have higher rates of hpv. It's not like if you don't have a certain piece and the hpv would've gone there, and then the HPV is just like "oh well guess there's no place for me to go" and disappears.

@bolded, no that is not true. There has never been a study showing that.