Circumcision ban getting people snippy.

[Wonktonodi]

theprof00 said:

Wonktonodi said:

theprof00 said:

Wonktonodi said:

no just a movement to curcumsize the men to make them less likely to get HIV from a woman who is posative, not as effective as a condom but it does help.

you know I don't mean to insult you wonk, but that is the most uninformed statement I've heard in a long long time.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132368

or one part from

"that Numerous studies have shown that male circumcision reduces the risk of contracting sexually transmitted diseases, foremost among them AIDs. Several studies done in Africa over the past decade have shown that circumcision results in a 50-60 percent reduction of HIV infection."

where is there something that is uninformed? 50 to 60%is less teffective than a condom but is much better than nothing

I've seen that study. All it says is that uncircumcised people get AIDS more than circumcised do. There is literally no scientific evidence. Science requires testing. ie; they should take 400 people, half of them circumcised, and inject them all with AIDs, or have them all have sex with AIDs infected people and see who develops it. (Of course, that is completely against scientific moral code, so they'll never do it. Unfortunately, all they have is links and no proof)

The actual result of this study only says that people who are circumcised as adults have less sex.

that study? so you saw one? good job now why not read all of them? then if they are all so wrong go tell the WHO that it's recomendation was wrong. Or maybe then you will just say it's adults and not babies changing the argument instead of conceding that there are benefits.