Shadowblind said:
Stupid design choices murdered the game. Low, low regenerating health? Only two guns at a time? Terrible button mashing sequences? The guns looked weak, graphics were sub-par, idiotic "puzzle" sequences with the cars and (dare I say it) even the humor was obnoxious . . . not humorous. Two enemies will get your health down faster then Halo. Repulsive. Duke Nukem should be all about testosterome and making you feel like a one man killing machine. Carry twenty guns, bullet sponge while massacreing hoards upon heards of enemies in awesome and humiliating ways. Add in just enough downtime with puzzles, then lead in with tons of enemy types and set pieces that'd make Uncharted blush. Being the one-man-army may sound last gen, but lets face it . . . it can be done incredibly well nowadays with effort put into it. Look at Bulletstorm for example. And this is Duke we're talking about. Or, well . . . WERE talking about . . . this game is NOTHING like old school. It's like last gen. If it was old school, it'd be perfect. I never thought I'd say this, but Duke Nukem needs to take a page from Serious Sam. |
shit you really don't know anything about duke do you? i think you should play prince of persia somemore getting everything handed 2 ya in a basket and unable 2 die
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
