scottie said:
2) My main point was that because IGN would not admit that Nintendo won E3 regardless of how obvious it was. I don't blame them for this, they've spent years gathering an audience for their site, and if they went around presenting a balanced, fair and sensible viewpoint, they would lose their entire readerbase overnight. They have to declare either Sony or MS the winner, or they lose a lot of money, so it should be no surprise that they declared Sony the winner, because as I already mentioned, Sony's E3 was better than MS's.
3) I'm not saying it was obvious that Nintendo won, by the way. I personally think they did because the big games they talked about had release dates attached to them, whereas the big games Sony talked about did not. I think Nintendo won because their 3DS announcements were better than Sony's Vita announcements. You obviously have a different opinion, which I am interested in reading. What i am not interested in reading, is a bunch of idiots with no journalistic integrity writing purely for money. |
sony annonuced more
annonucements for ps3 : dust 514, medevil moves, ruin, dragon's crown ( only kirby was new for the wii )
vita : ruin, dragon's crown, modnation racers vita, little big planet vita, etc ( more reveals than 3ds only luigis mansion was new )
games already revealed before conference ps3 : uncharted 3, resistance 3, starhawk etc
vita : little deviants, uncharted vita, etc
... i don't really know if its that your bias is blinding you but the fact remains that you're wrong nintendo revealed one new game for wii, none exclusively for wii u and just one new game for the 3ds ( luigis mansion )







