pearljammer said:
Simply becuase there are diseaes, however rare, associated with foreskin is not reason enough to allow mutilation. As someone who has grown in an area where there is very little circumcision, the very idea that one would suggest the cutting of their child's penis is frightening. Absolutely frightening. If someone later in life should want it, sure go ahead. I should be able to decide that my son would be better off without a part of his body simply becuase I prefer it that way. Btw... Go Canucks, go! |
So would you then propose a ban on all "mutilation"? Cutting off excess fingers, toes or say a tail, until the age of maturity, when they are able to make their own decision?
And thank you...although, the way things have unfolded in the past 2 games make me wish that your Habs were able oust them in the first round.