Porcupine_I said:
d21lewis said:
Porcupine_I said:
actually i believe that is part of the problem with nuclear power plants. there are too many old ones buildt in the 60's. There are so many new technologies and ways to make them safer then they used to be built now.
i do believe in using nuclear power, because it is a cheap source of energy. but safety should always be first. and Nuclear power plants that can not whitstand a airplane crash are not safe in this day and age, regardless how many fail safes are in place to eliminate human error.
|
In defense of the old plants, we do have "outages" every few months. The plant (or part of it, anyway) is totally powered down and everything is inspected. Lots of components get replaced or improved. It's not perfect, by any means. It's like replacing parts of an old car instead of buying a brand new car. Still, I've only been there for a couple of years and the amount of changes and improvements that have happened in just that small amount of time (I think I've seen about five outages) is pretty impressive. And for the record, our plant is reportedly able to withstand earthquakes and a direct hit by a commercial airplane. The key word is, reportedly--not quit sure how that would hold up in practice. Most of the key components are in hardened structures far underground with automatic systems designed to kick in if something goes wrong. I'll quit now because certain things are considered protected information so I won't go into it. From what I've seen and the propaganda they push on us, we're fine. Again, I can only speak of our particular plant and not every nuclear plant in the world.
|
of course, and i have no intention to imply that your plant is dangerous.
i believe though, what fukushima has shown, is that you can't just "power down" a nuclear power plant. some of the reactors haven't even been in use and still the used rods pose a great danger, and i bleive that is something that scared people a lot.
|
True. That's why I know I have job security. By powering down, I meant that they deactivated the component's energy producing capabilities. The radiation and such are still contained and if the containment is breached, then there's trouble. In an ideal situation, the containment walls will hold--but even then, those irradiated parts have to be protected and stored for years--probably decades. If my plant shut down today, I'd still have a job protecting it. And no, you didn't imply my plant was dangerous. I just didn't want to appear to be the spokesperson for the entire nuclear industry since I only have experience with only one plant.
