By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
4lc0h0l said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
Grandia said:
And who cars about this? I also can't see a real difference between Uncharted 2 and 3 it looks both quite similar, but it also do not real interest me any more because the next Generation of Consoles is very close, the PC is with his power far ahead of the PS3 and Xbox360 now. I think right now we are in a stage where no one do really care about the grafics of Xbox 360 and PS3 any more.


looks like someone with a £1000 gaming machine is getting jealous of what a £200 console can do.

no worries mate, one day you will understand the benefits of consoles and first party developers.

PS, crysis and portal are great on ps3 and it will also be fun playing diablo and witcher on ps3.

Lol funny how people still push the pc to a thousand when you can have a pretty good computer for a little more than half of that, still i own a ps3 and uncharted is my favourite series on the ps3, still i dont think that the graphic leap is that big, its notisable but nothing outstanding, Battlefield 3 looks way better in every aspect..(At least on PC, cant say the same for consoles as they havent shown gameplay on them)

MM so to summary: Uncharted 3 Graphic King on Consoles, Battlefield 3 is the GRAPHIC KING, so you might want to change the name of the topic =P i know you wont do it because your a ps3 fanboy =P still i love my ps3 so its fine.

even if you spend £1000, its still a fact that you will have to upgrade your GPU atleast once otherwise it wont match ps3 graphics.

your assuming that TODAY a PC less than £1000 will match ps3 but those who spend £500 on one 5 years ago when ps3 came out will hardly be getting 20fps on witcher and crysis and not even look as good as ps3.

for ps3 you spend £400 and thats it....graphics get better, not worse (like with PC)