By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
gorgepir said:
Interesting.
So if you have good relations with the US it is ok to have a nuclear bomb? That sounds strange. When was the last time you heard of an Iranian terrorist? There are always talks about pakistani terrorists, and most of the guys that brought the WTC down were in fact pakistani and saudis. If you really are worried about the bomb falling into terrorists hands, you should have been worried when pakistan got the bomb.
And they can attack because they can? I doubt it.
Lets look at the countries the US has attacked.
Afghanistan, with zero defense capabilities. The cost of the cruise missles were more than the things they destroyed.
Iraq, a country that was sanctioned for a decade, could not even get a single fighter plane in the air (not because the US was good but because they were bad), newest military equipment belonged to the late 80's.
I hardly think you can compare the likes of these two countries to Iran, which is much more advanced.
After all, with all this talk about the Iranians supplying militants in Iraq with weapons and the fear that the US army has of those weapons, can you imagine what weapons they are not supplying? Do you think that they will give away their best weapons? If their second rate weapons can harm the US so much that it is constantly complaining and whining about it, imagine what their first rate weapons will do.
I do think that the US will not attack.

Actually, it's not that it's ok to have a nuclear bomb if you have a good relation with the US, it's that it's not ok to have a bomb if you got a fight with the US. And i should be worried about a bomb in Pakistani hands? This would sound like that i think all pakistanis are terrorists. I am worried with any bomb in middle east but at least Pakistan don't diss US everytime, and vice versa.

And yes, they can attack Iran and preety much any other country out there.

OMG 200 posts




Flow -"The important is to pwn other ppl"