The comparison's are unfair. Bush visited under war which many of us disagreed with, his poilicies were the opposite of our then government (conservative, we were more socialist) and well, to many he just seemed like the american illinformed fool (whether or not he was).
Obama may not have installed or changed the US in a dramatic way USAians may have liked but he had a financial crisis to deal with, one not of his making or in his presidency but he dealt with it none the less even with the disproval this caused. I agree with many of the reasons Kantor mentioned before, his does have a dominant presence and a positive one at that.
But then what do I know, I (and a fair few of my friends) think Clinton was one of the best Presidents the USA has ever had.
Hmm, pie.
