Agree, I don't think you'll find too many people who disagree except for maybe people who work at EA.
I still fail to see how the PS3/360 version of BF3 is going to be that different from Bad Company 2. Console BF3 is going to have reduced map size (no jets?), and reduced player counts. This is a gimped game, and all the wonderful footage we've seen so far is for PC. Therefore I doubt the graphics will be a major improvement from the Bad Company 2 graphics. Bad Company 2 sold a lot of copies, but by its squad-based nature, it can never be as popular of a game CoD.
MW3 will be more engaging to the average, casual gamer. Only a minority of my friends like Bad Company 2 because it can't be played locally with friends, it has a frustrating learning curve, it has a limited number of game modes, it doesn't have enough game types, and it doesn't have the free-for-all modes that most of friends play.
Also,the 100 million marketing budget is the combined budget for both MW3 and BF3. Activision probably has more money to spend than EA on this because CoD generates a lot more revenue.
Most anticipated games of 2011:
Uncharted 3,Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword, Rocksmith
Modern Warfare 3, Super Mario 3D







