Rath on 13 January 2008
I'm 18 and you are reading WAY too much into the pictures.
The only one which is plausible is #7 which I have been told before has a rather phallic resemblance but the other two... I really am suprised how much meaning you can get out of them. What suprises me is that you can read so far into completely non abstract pictures, the first one is merely a piece of comic art and the second merely a still life. Neither were made to have any messages beyond what is obvious in them.
#7 is a completely different story as abstract works are always read completely differently by different people. My intention was a 'breaking the glass ceiling' idea, but I am not at all suprised you are able to read something different in it.
