Why renewable energy won't work.

[Kasz216]

Troll_Whisperer said:

Kasz216 said:

Troll_Whisperer said:

mrstickball said:

 

A

Yeah, but nuclear is not as safe. Dealing with waste is also a problem. I care about that more a slight difference in cost.

Less then half isn't slight.

Also perhaps it's just the way it's translated... babelfish wouldn't translate it for me... but the bolded seems to mean the savings are counting the imposed taxes meant to make oil more expensive, to make oil more expensive.

There's no price for human life.

Even without those it's a positive balance.

Use common sense.

If it was a positive balance it wouldn't need subsidies... because the electircity would be cheaper...

and less people die in Nuclear related accidents and uranium mining then mining accidents related to Solar and Turbine power and don't forget the toxic waste.

So you've argued yourself in a corner here... and are basically forced to admit that Nuclear Energy would be the best way to go... being the safest form.