smbu2000 said:
Just depends on what resolution your running at. I could play with ubersampling if I ran at 1080p (my old 24" resolution) or 1920x1200 resolution. I just got a new monitor, great deal on it!, (27" Dell u2711 http://tinyurl.com/yf3ukg4 ) which runs at 2560 x 1440 resolution and ubersampling runs just a tad slow at that resolution on my setup. I'd rather have the higher resolution with everything except uber, than a lower resolution with uber. This is an early performance review, before the 1.1 patch ( http://tinyurl.com/3kuju62 ) but you can see that a SLI/Crossfire setup(or dual gpu card) is pretty much required to enable uber at higher settings, ubersampling is a performance killer. (at 2560 x 1600, 30" monitors, it most likely requires a triple card setup) There are also a few screenshots there as well. (the test is done with a gtx 570 stock/oc, gtx 580 stock/oc and gtx 570 SLI oc) |
Curious on you're ubersampling performance ... you're res is clearly superior to mine but I would like to know AMD's card performance vs Nvidia, I cannot play this game at ultra spec due to ubersampling, it destroys framerate and action scene comes out at a pathetic 25fps (can dip to 20fps for a second or two!).
Do you think it's my hardware's lack of optimization or is the game simply that hectic?