sapphi_snake said:
The Fury said:
sapphi_snake said:
The Fury said:
Your right, I do. I had my full stop and stuff in the wrong place. How's this:
Renewable energies are never going to be feasable because of cost, at this time. It's not an option to have all power as renewable. We need to however do more to be less reliant on fossil fuels and in time cost of production and technology will make renewable ways of making energy not only more efficient but cheaper too.
The idea and gist being that at this current time it's not, and never will be, feasable but it will be in the future with the correct and right investment.
|
I'm sorry, I just can't help myself, butyou went and contradicted yourself again. The underlined part ruins the cohesiveness of your sentence. 
|
I'm off form and you are being pedantic this morning. I like it the sentence, to me, it makes sense. Thing A will never be possible unless Thing B occurs. My wording's not great, mind you, but then I'm still half asleep still.
|
Well, thing B will definately happen eventually (assuming manking doesn't stop making technological progress), so thing A is bound to happen too. You should also have some coffee. 
|
In this case Thing A (renewable power) needs the Thing B (investment and improvement) to occur else it's stuck, big investors being more then happy to stick with fossil fuels because it's most profitable now.
This article seem to be looking at Renewable energy as though it is today's technology and resources ignoring many advancements that humanity has made to make wind, sun or tide/wave over the last 50 years. Another 50 years and this might not be an issue if the right investment is made.
