By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
arcane_chaos said:

lol, I coundn't help but laugh(in a good way about some of you points i.e. the spider-man and L.A. Noir thing)

@ bolded: but I do argee(and not trying to throw the fanboy card in here) but is always does seem that reviews like to "nit-pick" when it comes to PS3 exclusives(GT5 and K3) and when 360 exclusive(and past timed-exclusives" really get a pass(i feel Gametrailers, IGN, and G4/X-play do this the most imo)

other than that, very good post

though I'd have to take your word on the beta part as sadly PSN was down so I couldn't try the beta...

I've noticed a lot of nitpicking particularly with exclusives [not just PS3 exclusives]. Halo Reach was nitpicked all to Hell. I can only speculate the reason(s), but I think either reviewers are getting harsher in their criticisms, or deliberately scoring lower for media attention.

Nevertheless, in inFAMOUS 2's case [so far], things haven't been that bad.

really?

it got a 9.5 by ign and a 10 by ign Uk.

and got like a 91-92 by metacritic/gameranking.

GT/KZ got 85 by ign, and sit at 84-86.

then you also have MLB the Show get a 80 by ign, but sits at 90 on meta.

ign also gave LBO2 "only" a 90 but has like a 93 meta.

 

 

and i will never forgive them for scoring Uncharted 2 a 9.5 when the meta/GR score is 96-96.5. :/