trasharmdsister12 said:
I don't think d21 was suggesting it was the undisputed top of 2008 graphics. He was just responding to someone who earlier suggested that Gears 2 wasn't even near (keyword... that's why it's underlined) the top of console graphics tech at its release. Now you must agree that it's just ridiculous to say that when, bar MGS4 (which we kind of already successfully pointed out - ends up being sort of a preference thing), Gears 2 was right up there at the time. d21 was just giving a few examples to show that it was indeed considered up there at the time of release by citing some graphics awards it had won and saying that no game could possibly win one if it looked poor as quite a few members here are suggesting. And yes, IGN and Gamespot (and many others) did give it to MGS4 (d21 was wrong here) but at the same time Gametrailers and Gamespy (and many others) gave it to GeoW2. So they're both damn fine looking games. Guten Tag Roomie!!! |
Oh I understood completely what he meant, I just didn't phrase it well.
See my response to him and you'll understand what I mean.
Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!
Kojima: Come out with Project S already!







