NJ5 said:
He was sued but that lawsuit didn't go anywhere (the settlement reached out of court was almost without consequences for Geohot). Sony can try to sue anyone, whether they're successful at it or not is a very different question. Disabling access to Sony's network is a different matter, since that's not a guaranteed part of the sold product. Obviously people would get pissed off at Sony if they ended the PSN since it is advertised as part of the PS3 experience, but Sony is still allowed to restrict access to it. Regarding the outright disabling of jailbroken products by Apple, I believe that would be a breach of the customer's rights and wouldn't hold up in court even if the "license agreement" theoretically allows them to do it. |
You do realise the reason this got dragged on for so long was that the law in question was one big grey area, and the law about jailbreaking only applies to handheld devices.
I do agree that as a consumer we should be able to do what we want to our devices but releasing the security keys to the world to do with as they wish was a very bad move by Hotz and really damaged his case.
OT: I hope this comes to nothing i'm sick and tired of these people "fighting for my rights" when i want to do is play my ps3 online, i'm old enough to realise that nothing good comes out of "revolution" and nothing good will come out of this.
So what would happen if Sony fell the target moves and the war carries on







