Kasz216 said:
In doing so you are restricting peoples rights by penalizing them for their life choices. Peoples rights exceed states rights. If you don't like the nation incuring costs from eating an unhealthy diet... then don't have the government pay for peoples healthcare. |
Well, it's not really "penalizing". It's making them personally incur the costs that they're simply forcing the nation to incur. As a conservative, you're against having tax payers pay for someone else's personal choice right? This is a way to prevent that in the least invasive way possible.
If we don't have the government pay for people's health care, then we have a lot of economic inefficienies, and on top of that, HUGE unrest. The lesson of the Great Depression, a lesson that Ottoman Bismark learned a long time before that, is that stability needs to be achieved, and compromise is needed.
FDR and the post-war governments are ultimately conservative. If you let things just free fall, you get extremism. Already, there's unrest with the tea party, and you can see the uproar the Ryan plan is causing with seniors. Now imagine a few more years when college graduates, after being raised with the assumption that they will join the middle class their parents raised them in, find that it no longer exists, and they can't get any jobs, permanetly fucking them over for their career development.









