SamuelRSmith said:
Also, I think there's a difference between educating, and constantly enforcing the ideas with propaganda. This is what I meant by the social engineering thing. By all means, teach kids in schools the basics of how to maintain a healthy diet... but by consistantly playing commercials, running billboards and bus prints, and all the rest of it, they're not just educating, but also imposing their will. Finally, the Government running these adverts is basically just subsidizing the health industries. The Government is paying for much of their advertisement costs, which really isn't fair. The industry os more than large enough, now, to fund its own advertising. --- Of course, much of US health problems come from HFCS... which wouldn't really be a key ingredient if it wasn't for Government meddling, with corn subsidies, in the first place. |
Not corn subsidies, but rather sugar tariffs, or that's what we're being taught in the International Trade class i'm taking atm. If sugar were taxed more fairly, companies would shift back to using real sugar in a lot of their products.
Agricultural subsidies just come with the territory of large economies, though. There's really no way to mobilize against them

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







