| Kasz216 said: Nah. The government overreaching would be them taxing unhealthy food. Educating people on what they should eat... that's what the government should be trying to do. Not sure how the plate is supposed to be better then the pyramid though. It might just cause people to eat taller cuts of meat. |
Hmm, I take issue with Government "educating" simply, because, really, it's a form of social-engineering. Not only that, but health effects from different diets is a highly controversial subject. The "6g of salt", or "5 portions of fruit and veg" stuff all has a lot of controversy behind it. In some ways, it's no different to the Government teaching Al Gore's approach to climate change.
Also, I think there's a difference between educating, and constantly enforcing the ideas with propaganda. This is what I meant by the social engineering thing. By all means, teach kids in schools the basics of how to maintain a healthy diet... but by consistantly playing commercials, running billboards and bus prints, and all the rest of it, they're not just educating, but also imposing their will.
Finally, the Government running these adverts is basically just subsidizing the health industries. The Government is paying for much of their advertisement costs, which really isn't fair. The industry os more than large enough, now, to fund its own advertising.
---
Of course, much of US health problems come from HFCS... which wouldn't really be a key ingredient if it wasn't for Government meddling, with corn subsidies, in the first place.
