vlad321 said:
o_O.Q said:
Kasz216 said:
o_O.Q said:
"You don't even understand that the laughable part is that you equate hacking your PS3 with PSN access."
i just asked you "go find me the quote of what i said that led to that hilarious assumption"
you still haven't shown me the quote where i equate the two
"You don't realize that hacking your PS3 is a right, and accessing PSN is just a privilage"
modifying a console and completely unlocking it to the point where it can be used for malicious acts are different things aren't they?
so now i have to ask you where i said that ALL forms of modification shouldn't be allowed? as far as i remeber i was talking about the keys and the exploits that allowed the console to be completely altered for malicious acts
|
No. unlocking it to where it can be used for malicious acts is just hacking something really well.
All that matters is when someone does use said unlocked console for malcious acts.
Then the person who specifically does that, gets punished.
If the world worked otherwise, the only videogames we'd be aloud to play would be games like cooking mama.
|
so therefore according to what you're saying on an individual basis people should be banned when they mess with the network?... if thats the case suppose for example i have 500 seperate matches going on simultaneously in a game online and spread between them i have 100 hackers interfering with them... according to what you're saying the people who want to play their games must suffer while a moderator takes the time to identify whos doing what and ban them... with the keys distributed that would be a constant issue because as some people are banned more people would be able to unlock their system and take their place... as i said before CoD was completely overun with that, to say that the only viable solution is individual banning is imo nonsense as matches would most likely be consistently interfered with
|
Ever hear of Steam, and how it deals with hacking?
|
i know nof steam but no i'm not sure how it deals with hacking individually?
