vlad321 said:
o_O.Q said:
vlad321 said:
o_O.Q said:
vlad321 said:
I never said you said all modifications are not allowed, I just said you are treating modification of the PS3 as a privilage, like PSN access, that can be restricted.
You try to justify forbidding modifications of your own privately owned property because of the fact that it may adversely affect a public service. If that is not the point you are making, then why the hell are you bringing up that people's modding may inconvenience people on the PS?
|
some modifications have to be restricted yes in the context of allowing the user of the modified console to interact with the network but i never said all
|
The opposite of no restrictoins, or a right, is that there exist some restrictions, thus it beocmes a privilage controlled by sony like PSN.
As I already said before, denynig people the right to modify their property as they see fit is a laughable stance.
|
you cannot modify something as you see fit and still interact with other people and their possessions ( in certain conditions ) thats what this is about not stopping modifications but determining which modifications cause harm to others and restricting them
just like the car for example yes i can strap a sword to my car but it must remain within my personal space i can't expect to go out and drive on the road therefore a restriction is imposed
|
A restriction is imposed on PSN, not on the hacking of the PS3. I can put any amount of swords I want in my car and not give a damn about anything. You have it all sorts of wrong.
|
i think we are going around in circles here :
"I can put any amount of swords I want in my car and not give a damn about anything"
didn't you say before that you would only be able to do that in a situation where you keep it locked down on your property? you're beginning to contradict yourself now
