Hey,
So I took a look at a few meta stuff and I just don't get this:
Are they randomizing what sites they add that reviews games?
If you look at for example: Portal 2
You see no review of GameReactor, But they have reviewed it and they gave it a 9. (Checked both PS3, X360 and PC!)
If you look at for example: Killzone 3
You see the review of GameReactor, and they have given it a 7.
There are TONS of examples like these. Also, can anyone find any title at the moment on the X360/PS3 that has over 80+ reviews? The only ones I can find are LBP2 and KZ3. Games like Mass Effect 2, Portal 2, LA Noire or wtf are all ending up on like ..50-60. Why are the PS3 exclusives getting 20-30 more reviews? Isn't it harder to maintain the score once you are having 80 reviewers give their opinion about your game, instead of for instance 50? The chances of it being higher are nothing compared to it being lower.
Bottomline:
Who determines and how do they determine what sites are added to what game?
