Ha! Anonymous didnt do it. It was Phantom.

[Alby_da_Wolf]

flyingforce said:

Alby_da_Wolf said:

flyingforce said:

Alby_da_Wolf said:

flyingforce said:

[...]

lol at calling geohotz honest

 

Isn't he? He was sued only in a civil lawsuit and never condemned. He always spoke against piracy. He just wants users to keep the freedom to modify what they buy for legit purposes.

thats bull, he is one of those losers that idolize rappers he did it for the attention and to be "bad ass" he knew his hack would be used for piracy and cheats 99 out of 100 times and he didn't care not to mention him distributing Sony's code illegally modified to be ripe for cheats and piracy 

Absolutely not bull. Until proven guilty of what you accuse him of, he's innocent. And actually nobody, not even Sony, ever pressed against him charges of piracy or complicity with pirates.

He addmitted guilt when he settled in court, so yes he is guilty and the only reason they didn't press charges is because he didn't directly give it to them, he gave it to everyone which was agaisnt another law, so yes he is guilty and yes it's his fault piracy and online cheating are here and everyone else involved in hacking the ps3, hell their at fault for removal of linux it wasn't taken out until they hacked it, you can blame sony all you want but bottom line no priracy and no cheating online is better then cheating and piracy and being able to play crappy homebrew games no1 even knows how to find 

Settling, nolo contendere and pleading guilty are three different things.

He settled, that is he reached an agreement with the counterpart. In this agreement he didn't admit any guilt of what you accuse him of. Actually Sony didn't even accuse him of the things you accuse him of, but I just read again your imaginative explanation of why in your opinion they didn't, and I suddenly and too late understood that you disconnected from reality. So sorry, I won't argue anymore with you, for the well known proverbial reasons.