| mchaza said: nope i fought AC2 was much better and i enjoyed AC1 more than AC2 because i knew what was going on and the neat twist at the end that got me, AC2 lost me with its completly lamest in the begining. All the Desmond parts were crap and the ezio got good until the end when the dlc skipping occured and the plot going bannanas in the end that totally lost me. But the gamplay was nice in AC2. Brother hood lost me on an few things. One the it was only one city. The Plot was stretched out dlc material. And ubisoft ruined everything when they placed waypoints you had to go though instead of the waypoint at the location you need to get too, making missions in an sandbox game linear, one of the worst design choices. |
I know what you mean, the story in AC1 had me hooked, then when it came to AC2 it became less believable towards the end, but the gameplay was excellent. i'm still contemplating getting Brotherhood now. i've spent about 100 hours on Tactics Ogre, and i'm planning to move onto something else now. but i doubt that game will be Brotherhood now!
