brendude13 said:
You said you proved Naughty Dog wrong, and last time I checked, Naughty Dog didn't claim that Uncharted 3 would run in 1080p, 60fps, 3D. Not even Ethomaz claimed that. And even if you did direct that "I proved them wrong" comment at Ethomaz then 1080p and 60fps is not needed to make a great 3D game, it's all about the depth the developer can create. For some games it works, for others is doesn't. The argument isn't about how powerful the hardware is, it's about what the developer can do with that hardware. And I used the monkey picture to make my comment a bit more lighthearted, so maybe you would be a little less antagonising, it clearly didn't work though. I'll leave it at that, I have faith in Naughty Dog and you don't need an expensive PC to produce some of the best 3D effects. |
I have faith in Naughty Dog as well, Uncharted 3 WILL BE the most impressive 3d game ever released on console undoubtedly.
But my patience lately with Ethmaz is wearing thin. I apologize for jumping the gun and starting an argument but I'm so sick of every single thread I go into seeing him just non stop talk about Sony and its excusives. This is a thread about 360 3D and what's the first thing he brings up? Uncharted. Every single thread he talks about PS3 undertracked, PS3 exlusives being the greatest things since sliced bread, PS3 this and that, even when the thread has nothing to do with that.
Again I apologize to everyone and I shouldn't have started an argument and gotten off topic. Either way more 3D support on 360 is great news for those who enjoy 3D, now hopefully the actual 3DTV costs will go down;








