By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S____M____C____C said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
S____M____C____C said:
M.U.G.E.N said:

The OP and some of the article authors should take note of some of our posters, hats off to those who noted the differred tax situation.

http://accounting-financial-tax.com/2009/08/deferred-tax-asset-and-its-valuation-allowance-with-case-examples/

Sony's fine :)

 

Here is a better article

"The immediate cause was a Y360bn one-time tax charge, as Sony wrote-off deferred tax credits it had banked during the past two years of deficits. The credits have value only if Sony is confident it can earn taxable profits in Japan in the future – but it said that confidence had been eroded by the disaster."

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/bf4fd94a-8506-11e0-871e-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=rss#axzz1NBEGhjGZ

but sony still owes the government Y360bn in taxes for the period ending 5 years from now? 

so, if it doesn't return to profit in the next couple of years, this could be quite harmful.

am i correct? this dta stuff is frying my head

lol don't worry. I'm an Accounting student just entering his Intermediate series and this stuff still confuse the *&%^ out of me. I'm gonna do my best to answer here and if Im mistaken I would be more than happy if someone can point it out

In essense I think you are right, it all comes down to their future performance as well. They posted 2 successive years of losses so by GAAP (actually wonder if Japan uses GAAP or IFRS) they HAVE to put this tax expense in their books by law if I'm not mistaken. Overall the bottom line is, it's not as bad as it may sound initially. Also I think sony have a positive on their operating income which is important, that's the foundation. They will be fine unless some extraordinary losses like tsunami happens again.

actually wonder if the tsunami costs can be considered as extraordinary costs. It depends on whether the area affected by it has a history of such tsunamis or not.

at the end of all this jibber jabber the bottom line is sony isn't doing great, but they aren't that bad off either. Here is a nice post I found on GAF with some extra details

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=28003272&postcount=109

and also LOL at those articles in which 'analysts' claimed PSN issue will cost sony Billions (2Bn iirc)

haha, we'll i'm an a-level business studies student at the minute so i was completely mindf**cked earlier, but i think i've got a decent grip on it now.

as a person i like to know everything, so when i don't know stuff it really annoys me. sucks.

and yea, if sony can return to profit in the next couple of years i don't believe any of this to be an issue. they are certainly much healthier now than they were a few years back due to the restructuring.

i guess they would have been mad not to write down these taxes now. 

mad and depending on the tax laws there, might have not had a choice either. But that's something I have no clue about. and many are waiting to see Thursday's financials to get a clear idea on the numbers. It should give a clear idea on where their operations are at at the moment ignoring incidents like earthquakes and such



In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!

"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"

For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!