Kasz216 said:
o_O.Q said:
Kasz216 said:
o_O.Q said:
Kasz216 said:
o_O.Q said:
"Theoretically, every network could be hacked" really? then what was the point of posting this :
"Anon FAILED to take down Amazon"
lol btw where did i say that that excuses sony of anything go back find the quote and show me i swear i'll retract it right away
furthermore yes more security could have been added, which may have delayed the hacking, but the end result would have been the same had the hackers been determined enough
"Most aren't, and for good reason" i disagree with the reason you stated whos to say that negligence like sony's isn't more wide spread?
|
Why would that matter? Negligence is negligence... and oh man.... the negligence here.
Either way, most companies aren't both negligent and then shouing "Hey come hack me!"
Though I don't think it could be that widespread among such large networks.
I mean, this is just ridiculious all these hacking cases.
|
please find me a quote for the sony rep who asked hackers to hack the company... if you do find it we can email sony and have him fired
furthermore this part : "most companies aren't both negligent and then shouing "Hey come hack me!" " doesn't really make sense in the context of hackers fighting for their own gains. I say that because assuming by "Hey come hack me!" you mean offending hackers, how is a company supposed to be aware of all of the actions they can take that would offend hackers? For example in this situatiopn with sony, how would sony have known that going to trial against geohot would have brought on this kind of reaction? ( assuming of course sony hasn't hired a team of psychics ) personally i was quite surprised by what happened
|
Common sense. If you really were suprised... I feel sorry for you.
Why would it matter? Well because there are dozens and dozens of systems out there, and it's a matter of just picking ones out randomly to hack.
Sony freaking out so badly about a hacker shows a complete lack of knowledge of how to deals with hackers, which suggests they probably have crappy security.
|
lol well im quite sorry but i guess you'll have to excuse my lack of understanding of hackers maybe some day i'll fall in a vat of nuclear waste and gain the ability to predict exactly what will offend people and how they will respond, but i guess until then i'll wallow in ignorance... if it happens though i'll volunteer to be a watch dog for sony
|
Dude, it doesn't take super powers... just basic comon sense and reasoning. Lots of people were predicting this when the hotz case started.
Targeting hackers... makes you a bigger target of hackers. Pretty obvious really.
|
so therefore the assumption can be reached that according to you anyone who has some applitude in some field should use that skill for payback against anyone who attacks or offends someone they know... therefore since i hypothetically have some skill in carpentry when my buddy got screwed over by his boss the other day i should have taken some tools and effed the bosses house up right? and the boss should have been aware ( through psychic powers supposedly ) that i was coming for him ( hypothetically ).... yup i see where you're coming from now... very sensible
