zarx said:
|
yes but most/all of that tech is no where near being able to be massed produced, at cheap costs for consumers.
they are anti-oil because carbon or something, anti-coal becuase carbon, anti-nuclear because i guess what you said (even though, it produces by far the most energy, per plant), anti-wind becuase, not in my back yard, "i can maybe see a speck of windmill 10 miles off coast", anti-solar because again NIMBY, and desert must be protected or something, anti-gas because of flacking i guess. there really isnt any energy they are pro for. they say they are pro renewable energy but, then when it gets time to act, they say no.