RolStoppable said:
That's not how the comparison should be made. You aren't supposed to compare products of the same company, but rather pit the winning systems of each generation against it each other. Therefore it isn't the Gamecube that gets compared to the GBA, but the PS2. The GC vs. GBA comparison just illustrates how big of a failure the GC really was, because there were tens of millions who were willing to buy Nintendo systems, but in the case of the GC chose not to. This ties in with the second point. If the industry keeps growing overall, but one company does not, then that is failure for the company that declined. More people than ever are buying hardware that plays games, but a company can't benefit from this? That's a sure sign that the company in question did something wrong and keep in mind that no company sets out with the goal of selling less than they previously did. So pretty much all the shortcomings can be traced back to the system itself and not some outside factors. Blaming something or someone else is just done to deflect from one's own failure. |
Ok. I guess I was arguing something different than you on the handheld/console sales side. I was pretty much just looking at nintnedo systems vs themselves, not other companies.
I don't like the sentiment that I can't defend or at least point out other factors that could be a part of the "slow" sales of the 3DS without it being labled blame. I'm not blaming, I don't think, but pointing out that there are multiple market factors that effect a products sales.
I'm excited to see how it all plays out. I'm not a blind fanboy, and I see your arguments and think they are very sound.I just think we have a different view on what a failure is.
LISTEN TO THE FIRST WORLD PODCAST REAL GAMERS, REAL AWESOME