Ha! Anonymous didnt do it. It was Phantom.

[o_O.Q]

Kasz216 said:

o_O.Q said:

"Theoretically, every network could be hacked" really? then what was the point of posting this :

"Anon FAILED to take down Amazon"

lol btw where did i say that that excuses sony of anything go back find the quote and show me i swear i'll retract it right away

furthermore yes more security could have been added, which may have delayed the hacking, but the end result would have been the same had the hackers been determined enough

"Most aren't, and for good reason" i disagree with the reason you stated whos to say that negligence like sony's isn't more wide spread?

Why would that matter?  Negligence is negligence... and oh man.... the negligence here.

Either way, most companies aren't both negligent and then shouing "Hey come hack me!"

Though I don't think it could be that widespread among such large networks.

I mean, this is just ridiculious all these hacking cases.

please find me a quote for the sony rep who asked hackers to hack the company... if you do find it we can email sony and have him fired

furthermore this part : "most companies aren't both negligent and then shouing "Hey come hack me!" " doesn't really make sense in the context of hackers fighting for their own gains. I say that because assuming by "Hey come hack me!" you mean offending hackers, how is a company supposed to be aware of all of the actions they can take that would offend hackers? For example in this situatiopn with sony, how would sony have known that going to trial against geohot would have brought on this kind of reaction? ( assuming of course sony hasn't hired a team of psychics ) personally i was quite surprised by what happened