Mr Khan said:
rocketpig said:
| o_O.Q said:
so i'm to gather that yes you do believe amazon can't be hacked? and that some networks are therefore incapable of being hacked? and that the militery's networks are protected to a lesser extent than amazon's? if so well i'll be honest i'd find that to be "fucking lame"
oh and btw when did i ever present any excuses? and what were those excuses presented for? as far as i remember i only made the point that no networks are safe from hacking
|
Theoretically, every network could be hacked. Most aren't, and for good reason. The people in charge of said networks work hard to make access as difficult as possible.
You claim you're not making excuses for Sony but just read through a few of the threads in this forum. There are dozens spouting that very line as if it magically exempts Sony from being a bunch of slack-ass twats.
|
Now i'm generally against Sony on this whole deal (NOT because i dislike Sony as a whole like some people are trying to claim), but while Sony takes a degree of blame in this, "they were asking for it," is never a valid reason, much like in instances of general assault or rape.
|
This isn't like rape or assault though. This is much more like a bank bragging that their vault is full of valuable stuff but it is impossible to rob. The main victim in both these cases isn't actually the direct victim, but the clients of that victim.
