pizzahut451 said:
|
Spain, Russia, China and India... in otherwords countries that have "seperatist" issues themselves... and in the case of Russia and China themselves have caused some serious genetic cleansings in the past.
I'm sorry, which side of this is supposed to have the agenda?
As for bases near Russia... what does anyone need bases near Russia for in this era of easy military projection?
Aside from which... you know. Spain was part of the peacekeeping forces in Kosovo until last year. They don't deny the attrocities, just that unilateral seperation is against international law. You know. Because of the Catalan and Basque seperatists.
This also appears to be the case in Russia. Don't deny the attrocities, just afraid of the precedent.
Afterall, there are plenty of groups in Russia who fit the same precedent... though the ethnic cleansings were further down the line in history.
Also as an aside, if a Native American group actually wants to be independent.... I'd be for it. I think it'd be a good thing actually if the various reservations went independent based on various issues in some areas related to law enforcement. Though the vast majority of Native Americans are against such a split.
Seperationists have tried votes among their councils... and they always fail pretty badly.
Even if I didn't, I wouldn't say "oh no, we never genocided them, the whole country was on vacation."
http://www.gamespot.com/users/UnknownPerson55/video_player?id=cHJglGf-5bsMuDPY
What's illogical and nationistic is that you are disagreeing with the majority, and actual found evidence of mass bodies... and instead citing people who mostly don't even agree the ethinic cleansing didn't happen, but insetad are citing them when all they believe is that doesn't give the right to cede.
These people all who have their own serperaist groups... and actually state that as one of the reasons they disagree, because they think allowing any seperation hurts them.








