Bong Lover said:
In a mechanical world, all our believes amount to nothing. They are just random collisions of atoms in a lump of fat. Also, the distinction between exsistence and non exsistence becomes meaningless since the matter exsists regardless of what happens to a human body. Remember, your soul or feelings doesn't really exsist in this world view, they are merely results of particles in motion. These particles will still move after death and destruction of the body. point 2, I readily agree and also pointed that out in the post you are quoting. However, for us to hold up life as 'better' than non-life there has to be some sort of fixed point of morality or ethics if you will. My point is that this fixed point can not be found if exsistence is reduced to nothing but a deterministic mechanical view. |
The fixed ethical point is life itself, that we live and agree we enjoy life and that we all have a right to live and a right to enjoy life to a degree that it does not harm other's enjoyment, and we might also take upon ourselves a duty to somewhat enrich the lives of others in the course of our life, but there need not be a higher power or point beyond the miracle of life itself
What i'm propounding here is not a nihilistic view, just one of finding meaning in the world that does not necessitate crafting powers that exist beyond the world. I believe religion can do good things for the world if it encourages us to enrich our lives and the lives of others and that these views might serve as a nice tool by making these concepts more palatable and less dry and/or dense, but that to speak of outside things is ultimately unnecessary. Goodness can be its own thing, unhinged, unexplained, yet built into our makeup

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







