So, which do people believe here had a better story, Red Dawn or Modern Warfare 2?
I ask that, because I am of the personal belief that Red Dawn has a borderline nonsensical storyline that only made sense during the Cold War. I would be interested in seeing someone say how the story in MW2 had more credibility than that of Red Dawn. So, for me, there is a ton of issues I could take with the story in Modern Warfare 2. Not taking shots at the production value, just the story. This is particularly true, considering the original story of Modern Warfare 1:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty_4:_Modern_Warfare
Modern Warfare 2 did a HORRIBLE job justifying how the events turned out in it, coming off the prior storyline. For me, I was left with, this is utter B.S. Oh highly polished B.S with a great music score, but a story that seemed utter bullocks for me. But, others can fill in why. I just don't buy the events. No way a single attack in an airport would set off a series of events like that. Nothing about going before the U.N or anytying, and no sign thaqt the Ultrantaionalists actually did take over in Russia. Don't see it at all. If it is all there, then they did a poor job explaining it to me.
